Skip to main content

Objective3D Service Bureau Helps You Find the Right Technology for Your Application

There’s more than one way to build an idea. Today’s advanced 3D printing and advanced manufacturing processes boast fantastic design feats, which can make it difficult to determine the right manufacturing technology for your project. However, 3D printing isn’t a one-size-fits all technology. That’s why Objective3D Service Bureau (ANZ's largest additive manufacturing centre) offers all the major 3D printing processes in-house alongside our advanced conventional manufacturing solutions. To learn more about which technology is best for your manufacturing project, check out some of the pros and cons of each process and hear from our Stratasys partnered engineers on their favorite technologies below.

PolyJet


Pros: A material jetting process, PolyJet builds in layers as thin as 0.0006” which gives PolyJet parts a smoother surface right off the machine when compared to other 3D printing processes. PolyJet is capable of building hybrid, multi-material parts with a range of durometers and mechanical properties simultaneously in one build to deliver realistic tactile models. One of PolyJet’s greatest attributes is speed. Parts that fit roughly within a 5” x 5” cube can build within hours. PolyJet applications include master patterns for urethane casting, presentation models and concept models.

Cons: While PolyJet can be bonded together to form large parts, costs significantly increase as designs get larger. This is partly because of the time required to print designs that exceed a 5×5” cube.


Stereolithography (SL)


Pros: A vat polymerization technology, SL shines in the prototype and pattern realm. Plastics used with SL provide easily sanded surfaces and are ideal for post-process finishing. SL is a favorite for large models and investment cast patterns for low volume projects. It is a staple in the aerospace industry for the casting of engine components. SL high definition processes build some of the finest feature details which ranks SL as a top go-to technology for detailed prototypes.

Cons: SL materials have low heat deflection temperatures and low tensile strength; they aren’t ideal for rugged testing or most end-use applications.


Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)


Pros: A material extrusion additive manufacturing process, FDM offers production materials such as ULTEM, ABS, ASA and biocompatible polycarbonate high performance thermoplastics. FDM parts have been certified for flight, heavily used in the transportation industry for prototype, pre-production and production applications as well as in hundreds of other industries both large and niche. FDM manufactures durable parts which have properties close to injection molding but with the added benefit of 3D printing complexity and design freedom.

Cons: FDM builds in thicker layers than PolyJet or SL, which makes it less ideal for finely detailed prototypes due to the visible layer lines. Smooth surfaces can be achieved through post-processing such as hand sanding and bead blasting, but FDM cannot match the feature details of PolyJet and SL.


Laser Sintering (LS)


Pros: LS builds in a self-supporting bed of plastic powder, making it the only 3D printing process that does not require supports attached to actual part features. This unique aspect of LS allows a level of complexity unimaginable in conventional manufacturing. No access features, undercuts and intertwining designs are an easy feat for this technology. Aside from its ability to build complex geometries, LS utilizes nylons that can be highly heat deflective, certified for aircraft, chemical resistant, biocompatible and very rugged.

Cons: LS builds in a chamber just below the natural melting point of its plastic. Large flat or box-like parts typically aren’t ideal for the technology due to warp.


Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS)


Pros: DMLS is a 3D printing technology that builds fully dense metal designs in titanium, aluminum, Inconel, stainless steel and cobalt chrome alloys. No access design features such as internal cavities and channels, attachment features and other intricate inclusions are built simultaneously in one part through DMLS. Metal parts built through DMLS can go through heat and HIP treatments to bring out optimum mechanical properties.

Cons: DMLS requires build supports for features below 45 degrees. Supports are built from the same metal as the final part. Support removal and finishing can be time consuming and require skilled professionals to remove.


Urethane Casting


Pros: Urethane casting is a traditional manufacturing technology that benefits from the advantages of 3D printing or CNC machining. 3D printed and machined master patterns are used to create silicone molds, or tools, which are cast with advanced formula polymer (AFP) urethanes. Urethane casting is frequently used as a low-volume production solution when limited quantities are required in a short amount of time Urethane casting simulates injection molding with smooth, textured, cast in color and assembled products. It is an invaluable resource to the medical large cart manufacturing industries thanks to its ROHS, ROHS2, REACH and SVHC compliant materials

Cons: Urethane casting is ideal for low volume production. Mold life is good for about 10-50 shots, 50-100 in certain applications. Urethane casting is valued for its ability to quickly manufacture production pieces and get products to market first while tooling for injection molding is created for larger production runs.


CNC Machining
Pros: CNC machining with Stratasys Direct Manufacturing is a streamlined solution for projects requiring strict tolerances or specialty materials unavailable through other means. CNC machining is a conventional manufacturing method ideal for prototypes, large production models, master patterns and jigs and fixtures.

Cons: CNC machining can require involved programming; complex geometries may equate to multi-step programming and design orientation to realize a design. Therefore, CNC machining is best for simple designs when compared to 3D printing.


Tooling and Injection Molding
Pros: Injection molding is an excellent option for mass production runs with part quantities exceeding 500 – 1000. While the cost of the tool is typically high, the price is offset by the volume of parts which makes injection molding the perfect solution for mass production needs. Injection molding offers the widest range of materials.

Cons: Injection molding is a lengthy process with design constraints that might be less ideal for certain applications.

When determining the right technology for your project, talk with one of our dedicated project engineer Simon Bartlett at simon@objective3d.com.au or call 03-9785 2333 (AUS) 09-801 0830 (NZ)

Content Source: Stratasys Direct Manufacturing Blog

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering High Quantities of Prototypes Fast

Objective3D Direct Manufacturing produces parts using a range of additive and conventional manufacturing technologies. We offer tailored solutions for your project’s needs. If your project requires larger quantities of small parts – fast, Laser Sintering is the best technological solution for you. Per-part pricing is reduced as quantities increase, but there are more advantages to using Laser Sintering for small prototypes than price alone.

Laser Sintering (LS) provides strong, versatile and geometrically intricate components made from filled and un-filled nylon materials that are ideal for fit and form verification and functional testing. Prototypes made with LS are created quickly and offer robust solutions for your project.
FAST Delivery Laser Sintering can provide sturdy, functional prototypes as little as 24 hours. Multi-component designs can be incorporated into single structures, allowing engineers to produce complex features and geometries in one print, and eliminating the need…

Commodore Ute to US: 100,000 votes needed!

According to The Age Drive and an article by Barry Park, we are again set to export our Commodore Ute to the US.

The article is as follows:

US website rallies to GM's Twitter call of 'If you ask for an El Camino ute, we'll do it'.

An off-the-cuff quip from General Motors' newly appointed chief marketing officer could be just the thing to help Holden's cause to sell the Commodore ute in the US.

Joel Ewanick, who made the jump from Hyundai to the US car maker late last year, recently joined the social networking service Twitter. He soon started interacting with Chevrolet fans, with many of them asking for the car maker to re-introduce a vehicle based on a cross between a truck (ute) and a car.

In response to one passionate request for a new-age El Camino, Ewanick wrote: ''Well, we need you and 100,000 more of your best friends.''

Advertisement: Story continues below That was enough for US motoring website Jalopnik, which is now on a campaign to collect…

Canberra para-athlete Scott Reardon wins gold with 3D Printed Spike Plates

Canberra para-athlete Scott Reardon has sprinted his way to gold at the IPC Athletics World Championships in Doha with victory in the T42 100m for leg amputees.

The fastest qualifier coming into the finals, Reardon, using a 3D Printed Spike Plate, got his nose in front to stop the clock in a time of 12.13 seconds - a mere one-hundredth of a second in front of Russia's Anton Prokhorov.
It was sweet revenge for Reardon, the 25-year-old having to share the gold medal two years ago at the world championships in Lyon in 2013 with Germany's Heinrich Popow​.
"You come to championships to win championships and that's the most important thing," Reardon said.
"I probably didn't get the time I wanted, but when people look back, how I got there won't matter. "It will just show me as world champion, and that's so exciting."
The result is the culmination of more than a decade of determination and training.

The Spike Plates which Reardon used in the …